|
Date: Monday, 06/07/2009 | |
| 1:00pm - 2:00pm | Registration |
| 2:00pm - 2:15pm | Conference opening & welcome |
| 2:15pm - 3:15pm | Plenary 1: Malcolm Coulthard: 'Whither Forensic Linguistics?' |
|
|
Whither Forensic Linguistics? Aston University, United Kingdom |
| 3:30pm - 5:30pm | 1A: Thematic session: Courtroom interpreting |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
Multilingual courtroom: Interpreting practices at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1UNSW, Australia; 2Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona Spain; 3University of Salford, UK |
| 3:30pm - 5:30pm | 1B: Thematic session: Cultural differences in investigative interaction |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Cultural differences in investigative interaction 1Lancaster University, United Kingdom; 2Twente University, The Netherlands; 3Seconda Universita degli Studi di Napoli, Italy |
| 3:30pm - 5:30pm | 1C: Thematic session: Studies in forensic linguistics for pre-law students |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Studies in Forensic Linguistics for Pre-law Students: Language minority issues in the U.S. legal system Brigham Young University, United States of America |
| 3:30pm - 5:30pm | 1D: Thematic session: Learning to research forensic linguistics |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
The Undergraduate Classroom in Focus: Learning to Research Forensic Linguistics University of Leeds, United Kingdom |
| 5:30pm | Reception, poster presentations & presentation of the Malcolm Coulthard Scholarship Award and the Travel Grant in Honour of Roger Shuy |
|
Date: Tuesday, 07/07/2009 | |
| 9:00am - 10:00am | Plenary 2: Diana Eades: 'Language ideologies, inequality and the legal process' |
|
|
Language ideologies, inequality and the legal process University of New England, Australia |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Coffee break |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 2A: Courtroom discourse: Witness statement Session Chair: Prof. Susan Lynn Ehrlich |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
Getting the story from child witnesses: Applying a story grammar framework 1Monash University, Australia; 2Deakin University, Australia ‘Our lives will never be the same again’: a study of witness impact statements and their recent introduction into the British criminal justice system Cardiff University, United Kingdom Australian Indigenous Witnesses and their Narratives in the Courtroom Context. 1Monash University, Australia; 2Private Research Consultant; 3Edith Cowan University Linguistic Analysis of Witness Statements in Litigations 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Croatia (Hrvatska); 2University of Applied Sciences Vern, Department for German Language |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 2B: Police interview: Discourse analysis Session Chair: Dr. Alison Jeannette Johnson |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
UK Police Interviews: An Analysis of Overlapping Talk in Afro-Caribbean and White British Suspect Interviews The Police Foundation, United Kingdom The cognitive status of referring expressions in police interviews Simon Fraser University, Canada ‘The discursive construction of evidence in the police interview: case study of a rape suspect.’ University of Nottingham, United Kingdom How talking and typing work together in a police interrogation VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands, The |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 2C: Frames, schemas and cognitive maps Session Chair: Prof. Wilbert Spooren |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
"Maybe we can't prove you mean it, but...": Using 'community of practice' arguments to measure speaker intent. Bangor University, United Kingdom From Court Transcripts to a Semi-automated Argumentation System King's College London, United Kingdom A Case Study on the Frame of Legal Language National Chengchi University, Taiwan Narrative Domains in Serial Offender Narrative Discourse: Implications for Geographic Profiling Georgetown University, United States of America |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 2D: Authorship / Speakership analysis Session Chair: Dr. Jordi Cicres |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
Towards a morpho-syntactic base-rate knowledge: apparent and real time dimensions of idiolectometric analyses of Catalan UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA, Spain Morpho-syntactic idiolectal similitude in written Spanish Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain Stylometric and error analysis in the context of a style shift in abusive e-mail texts University of South Africa, South Africa Indicators of authorship by a L1 German speaker for English texts. Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom www.forensiclinguistics.net |
| 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Lunch |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 3A: Courtroom discourse: Interpreting Session Chair: Prof. Susan Berk-Seligson |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
Quality of witness testimony taken with the assistance of unqualified interpreters and its impact on a criminal trial– an Irish example. Dublin City University, Ireland (Republic of) Testifying with a court interpreter or without: Comparing recurrent narratives across proceedings York University, Canada The Dynamics of Interaction in Magistrates' Courts in St. Lucia. University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 3B: Problems in police interviews Session Chair: Dr. Frances Eileen Rock |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Who’s Telling the Truth?:Revisiting an Interrogation of an Accused Child Abuser 1Pima Community College, United States of America; 2John Jay College of Criminal Justics, New York City, NY, USA Interpreting 'uninterpretable' silences in police interviews University of Melbourne, Australia Police Interview and Court Proceedings -- In Search of Truth Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong S.A.R. - China |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 3C: Courtroom discourse: Linguistic analysis Session Chair: Dr. Chris Heffer |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Appraisal Linguistic Resources in Chinese Vs Common-law Civil Judgments of Intellectual Property Infringment Cases Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China, China, Peoples Republic of "If it doesn't fit you must acquit": 'Reasonable Doubt' and its influence on Modality in the Courtroom. University of Ottawa, Canada |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 3D: Corpus linguistics applied across borders Session Chair: Prof. Wilbert Spooren |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
Advances in Threat Assessment and Analysis Techniques: the Communicated Threat Assessment Reference Corpus (CTARC) 1University of California, Davis, United States of America; 2Academy Group, Inc., United States of America Strangers in the Court? Identifying legal Maori language Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand |
| 3:30pm - 4:00pm | Coffee break |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 4A: Courtroom discourse: Expert witness Session Chair: Dr. Katrijn Maryns |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
Professionalisation and standards in forensic linguistic practice. Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom Language and power in a dialect speaking court: the case of Cyprus University of Cyprus, Cyprus Resolving Unresolvable Ambiguity in an Expert Witness's Testimony: A Court Duke University, United States of America |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 4B: Police interview: Formulations Session Chair: Dr. M. Komter |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
“So did you actually see him…”: Discourse markers, formulations and narrative evaluation in police interviews with rape complainants. Centre for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, United Kingdom Courtroom Interaction Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - Unisinos, Brazil Confrontational formulations in police interrogations VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands, The |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 4C: Legal language and comprehensibility Session Chair: Prof. Peter Tiersma |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
The Biggest Debt, The Least Understood: Comprehension of U.S. Mortgages University of Washington, United States of America Great Expectations: A Radical New Approach to Assessing Readability in Legal Documents Duke University, United States of America Latinisms in legal language revisited: comprehensibility within and across borders? University of Alicante, Spain, Spain |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 4D: Discrimination in the law Session Chair: Dr. Joyce Lamerichs |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
Linguistic Ideology versus Linguistic Practice: The Cognitive and Cultural Challenge of Code-Switching to English-Only Rules in American Workplaces Seattle University, United States of America Keeping it Real or a Whitewash: Dialogue & Review of Reasons for Peremptory Strikes California Appellate Project, United States of America Definitions of anti-semitism within the EU: a case of legilinguistic lobbying 1University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; 2Language Consultancy Desk, Birmingham, UK |
|
Date: Wednesday, 08/07/2009 | |
| 9:00am - 10:00am | Plenary 3: Edward Finegan: 'Of course, legal drafters should avoid intensifiers. Blah, blah, blah!' |
|
|
Of course, legal drafters should avoid intensifiers. Blah, blah, blah! University of Southern California, United States of America |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Coffee break |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 5A: Courtroom discourse: Dramatization Session Chair: Dr. M. Komter |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
The cultural defense as courtroom drama: The interactional construction of sameness and difference in criminal trial discourse Ghent University, Belgium Theatricks on trial: the intertextual construction of legal cases Gent University, Belgium Reported speech in monologues by prosecutor and defence lawyer in the courtroom Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands, The Rethinking Jury Instructions: Fact-Finding v. Legal Theory? The University of Tennessee, United States of America |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 5B: Authorship, plagiarism, & software Session Chair: Prof. Malcolm Coulthard |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Plagiarism of the greatest ever theory or just simultaneous discovery of the theory of evolution? 1CFL Software Limited, United Kingdom; 2Hallmarks Solictors, United Kingdom When News becomes a Forensic Issue 1Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom; 2Universidade do Porto & CLUP, Portugal 20,000 Ways Not to Do Authorship Attribution -- and a Few that Work Duquesne University, United States of America Is individual variation the neglected step-sibling in authorship analysis? Forensic Linguistics Institute, United Kingdom |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 5C: Linguistic Analysis: Deception, oddness, illness detection Session Chair: Keun Young Sliedrecht |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
"Oddness" in Suicide Notes The University of Birmingham, U.K., United Kingdom A Strategy for Deception Detection: Collective Cues to Deception in Written Text Aston University, United Kingdom Acquitted: Mentally Unstable Centre of Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom Error production strategies for deception purposes University of Goettingen, Germany |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 5D: Interpreting records, evidentiality and court judgements Session Chair: Dr. Ronald Richard Butters |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
Evidentiality and the construction of proff in crimes of word: calumny, slander and prejudice 1Unicamp, Brazil; 2Unicamp, Brazil Post-Penetration Rape and the Decontextualization of Witness Testimony York University, Toronto, Canada Crtiteria for Judging the faithfulness of Records of Trials--- from the Point of View of Records of Civil Trials Northwest University of Politics & Law, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China Construction and Deconstruction in Court Judgments City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. - China |
| 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Lunch |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 6A: Courtroom discourse: Lawyer & prosecutor language Session Chair: Dr. Fleur van der Houwen |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
Between confrontational monologue and rational dialogue: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China, Peoples Republic of A Means for Clarifying the Subtlety of Lawyers' Language University of Haifa, Israel Three 19th-Century Trial Manuals: Exploring the Discursive Proto-Culture of Anglo-American Trial Advocacy Montana State University, United States of America |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 6B: Police work Session Chair: Tessa Cyrina van Charldorp |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Scripting in non-emergency telephone calls to the police Cardiff University, United Kingdom Accuracy and predictor variables of listeners’ identification of male speaker body size, age, and ethnicity Brigham Young University, United States of America Police Discourse Around Domestic Violence 1University of Plymouth, United Kingdom; 2University of Plymouth, United Kingdom |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 6C: Legal text production and analysis Session Chair: Prof. Lawrence Solan |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Why are contracts in English so resistant to Plain language drafting? University of Foggia, Italy “Including but not limited to” everything in the universe? Interpreting the extent of lists in common law agreements Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain On some features of supranational statutory texts in unifying Europe New Bulgarian University, Bulgaria |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 6D: Speaker ID & idiolect Session Chair: Prof. Maria Teresa TURELL |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
The effect of language contact on a speaker’s idiolect: variation in apparent and real time. Unversitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain Index of Idiolectal Similitude (IIS) for the phonological module of Mexican Spanish Universitat Pompeu Fabra Index of Idiolectal Similitude for the phonological module of Catalan: apparent and real time revisited UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA, Spain |
| 3:30pm - 4:00pm | Coffee break |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 7A: Courtroom discourse: Pragmatics Session Chair: Prof. Sigurd D'hondt |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
The Pragmatics of Courtroom Discourse: Saving One’s Face in the Witness Box Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic Does ‘adversarial’ mean ‘impolite’ in the courtroom? A diachronic exploration of face-threatening-acts University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom Mitigation as a Stance-marking Strategy in Courtroom 1National Taiwan University, TAIWAN; 2National Taiwan University, TAIWAN |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 7B: Language minority & administration of justice Session Chair: Dr. Diana Eades |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Inter-ethnic discourse over indigenous rights to autonomous administration of justice in highland Ecuador: constructing and interrupting Quichua narratives” Vanderbilt University, United States of America The Koori Court revisited: a Review of Cultural and Language Awareness in the Administration of Justice Monash University, Australia SUPPORTING JUSTICE REFORM IN JAMAICA THROUGH LANGUAGE POLICY CHANGE University of the West Indies, Jamaica |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 7C: Legal translation Session Chair: Dr. Krzysztof Kredens |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Legal translation problems versus legal language features Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Reconstructing Reality in Legal Source Texts Chongqing Medical University, China, Peoples Republic of Legal translator training: knowledge-based approach to terminology for inverse translation purposes Institute of English, University of Gdansk, Poland |
| 4:00pm - 5:30pm | 7D: Professionalisation and teaching of forensic linguistics Session Chair: Prof. Edward Finegan |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing- True or False? Teaching Non-academic Forensic Linguistics in the Workplace St Helens College, United Kingdom Implementing the “Guidelines for the Use of Language Analysis” when determining national or regional origin in asylum cases De Taalstudio, Netherlands, The Setting Standards for Research In Forensic Linguistic Identification Brooklyn Law School, United States of America |
| 7:00pm - 11:00pm | Conference dinner (social program) |
|
Date: Thursday, 09/07/2009 | |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Coffee |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 8A: Courtroom & mediation discourse: Professional & lay Session Chair: Dr. Fleur van der Houwen |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
A Corpus Analysis of Linguistic Communication between Lay and Professional Judges in Japan 1Meiji University; 2National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies; 3Ritsumeikan University The Unequal Encounter between the Cross-Examiner and the Witness in a Judicial Cross-Examination: The case of Goldenberg Commission of Enquiry in Kenya. Leipzig University, Germany Homeless Court in Santa Monica, California Santa Monica Community College, United States of America Assessments in family mediation interaction Federal University at Juiz de Fora, Brazil |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 8B: Speaker ID Session Chair: Dr. Tim Grant |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Spectral characteristics of sounds as predictors of speech volume level Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany The variations of F0, F1 and F2: examples in the Spanish language of Chile 1INSTITUTO DE LINGÜISTICA Y LITERATURA/ UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE (CHILE); 2INSTITUTO DE ACÚSTICA/ UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE (CHILE) Analysis of Yoruba tones and double consonants for forensic speaker identification purposes Texas State University, San Marcos, TX. USA, United States of America |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 8C: Linguistic analysis: Discourse markers, labeling & membership categorization Session Chair: Dr. Janet Cotterill |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Forensic Narrative Revisited: Category, Structure, Inequality Cardiff University, United Kingdom Forensic applications of discourse marker analysis Hofstra University Forensic Linguistics Project, United States of America Membership Category Terms in Court Discourse about Same-Sex Marriage University of Colorado, United States of America |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | 8D: Courtroom discourse: speech acts Session Chair: Dr. Petra Wilma Jolanda Sneijder |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
Rise and fall of a speech act sanction: Apologizing in German juvenile criminal justice University of Regensburg, Germany Performativity, Technology and Judicial Activity: Opening French Courtroom Hearings at a Distance by Videoconference 1Telecom Paristech, France; 2ISP6GAPP, ENS Cachan, France Humor in the adversarial courtroom Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia Presuppositions in Court Examinations Zhejiang Gongshang University, China, Peoples Republic of |
| 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Lunch & Business meeting (location for businesss meeting tba) |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 9A: Jury instructions Session Chair: Prof. Bethany K. Dumas |
| 2A-06 | |
|
|
The Effect of Narrativisation on the Comprehension of Jury Instructions Cardiff University, United Kingdom Clarity in Death Penalty Jury Instructions: Ensuring Justice by Explaining the Law to Non-Lawyers Devney Linguistic Consulting, United States of America Asking jurors to do the impossible Loyola Law School, United States of America |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 9B: Police interview Session Chair: Dr. Kate Haworth |
| 2A-02 | |
|
|
Identifying effective question strategies within police investigative interviews 1Sussex Police, United Kingdom; 2University of Portsmouth "I know it sounds daft but": The effect of the tape on the interaction in police interviews University of Essex, United Kingdom |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 9C: Language policy and language proficiency Session Chair: Prof. William Gregory Eggington |
| 5A-02 | |
|
|
Language Policy, Language Choice and Language Alternation in Conflict Resolution: Comparing Adversarial and Arbitral Discourse in Multilingual Malaysia. 1Nihon University, Japan; 2Malaya University, Malaysia Exploring issues in “faking” or “malingering” language proficiency by suspects Immaculata University, United States of America The impact of the Literacy/ Illiteracy parameter on Moroccan criminal trials. Mohamed V University,Rabat, Morocco |
| 2:00pm - 3:30pm | 9D: Authorship analysis, Linguistic Style Matching, Translation Session Chair: John Gabriel Olsson |
| 5A-06 | |
|
|
I never said that! The problem of translated records of interpreted police interviews with suspects Aston University, United Kingdom Propositional Density in Authorship Analysis: Automated vs. Manual Measurement University of Alaska Fairbanks, United States of America Linguistic Style Matching in Crisis Negotiations: A Comparative Analysis of Suicidal and Surrender Outcomes Wake Forest University, United States of America |
| 3:30pm - 4:00pm | Coffee break |
| 4:00pm - 5:00pm | Plenary 4: Ton Broeders: ‘Recent Trends in Forensic Linguistics – Avoiding the Observer’s Paradox and Formulating Logical Conclusions’ |
|
|
‘Recent Trends in Forensic Linguistics – Avoiding the Observer’s Paradox and Formulating Logical Conclusions’ Maastricht University and Leiden University, Netherlands, The |
| 5:00pm | Reception |