Date: Monday, 06/07/2009
1:00pm - 2:00pmRegistration
 
2:00pm - 2:15pmConference opening & welcome
 
2:15pm - 3:15pmPlenary 1: Malcolm Coulthard: 'Whither Forensic Linguistics?'
 
 

Whither Forensic Linguistics?

Malcolm Coulthard

Aston University, United Kingdom

3:30pm - 5:30pm1A: Thematic session: Courtroom interpreting
2A-06 
 

Multilingual courtroom: Interpreting practices at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Ludmila Stern1, Nata Hajdu2 and Stefan Mikulin3

1UNSW, Australia; 2Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona Spain; 3University of Salford, UK

3:30pm - 5:30pm1B: Thematic session: Cultural differences in investigative interaction
2A-02 
 

Cultural differences in investigative interaction

Paul J. Taylor1, Ellen Giebels2, Karlijn Beune2, Augusto Gnisci3 and Samuel Tomblin1

1Lancaster University, United Kingdom; 2Twente University, The Netherlands; 3Seconda Universita degli Studi di Napoli, Italy

3:30pm - 5:30pm1C: Thematic session: Studies in forensic linguistics for pre-law students
5A-02 
 

Studies in Forensic Linguistics for Pre-law Students: Language minority issues in the U.S. legal system

William Gregory Eggington and 18 students from BYU to be named later

Brigham Young University, United States of America

3:30pm - 5:30pm1D: Thematic session: Learning to research forensic linguistics
5A-06 
 

The Undergraduate Classroom in Focus: Learning to Research Forensic Linguistics

Alison Jeannette Johnson, Ruth Clifford, Francisco Alberto Gomez Moya, Kath Oldroyd and Claire Tierney

University of Leeds, United Kingdom

5:30pmReception, poster presentations & presentation of the Malcolm Coulthard Scholarship Award and the Travel Grant in Honour of Roger Shuy
 
 
Date: Tuesday, 07/07/2009
9:00am - 10:00amPlenary 2: Diana Eades: 'Language ideologies, inequality and the legal process'
 
 

Language ideologies, inequality and the legal process

Diana Eades

University of New England, Australia

10:00am - 10:30amCoffee break
 
10:30am - 12:30pm2A: Courtroom discourse: Witness statement
Session Chair: Prof. Susan Lynn Ehrlich
2A-06 
 

Getting the story from child witnesses: Applying a story grammar framework

Pamela Claire Snow1 and Martine Beryl Powell2

1Monash University, Australia; 2Deakin University, Australia


‘Our lives will never be the same again’: a study of witness impact statements and their recent introduction into the British criminal justice system

Janet Cotterill

Cardiff University, United Kingdom


Australian Indigenous Witnesses and their Narratives in the Courtroom Context.

Judith Rochecouste1, Ellen Grote2, Ann Galloway3 and Graham McKay3

1Monash University, Australia; 2Private Research Consultant; 3Edith Cowan University


Linguistic Analysis of Witness Statements in Litigations

Gabrijela Kišiček1 and Lucia Miškulin Saletović2

1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Croatia (Hrvatska); 2University of Applied Sciences Vern, Department for German Language

10:30am - 12:30pm2B: Police interview: Discourse analysis
Session Chair: Dr. Alison Jeannette Johnson
2A-02 
 

UK Police Interviews: An Analysis of Overlapping Talk in Afro-Caribbean and White British Suspect Interviews

Claire Emma Louise Jones

The Police Foundation, United Kingdom


The cognitive status of referring expressions in police interviews

Lorna Fadden

Simon Fraser University, Canada


‘The discursive construction of evidence in the police interview: case study of a rape suspect.’

Kate Haworth

University of Nottingham, United Kingdom


How talking and typing work together in a police interrogation

Tessa Cyrina van Charldorp

VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands, The

10:30am - 12:30pm2C: Frames, schemas and cognitive maps
Session Chair: Prof. Wilbert Spooren
5A-02 
 

"Maybe we can't prove you mean it, but...": Using 'community of practice' arguments to measure speaker intent.

June Luchjenbroers and Michelle Aldridge

Bangor University, United Kingdom


From Court Transcripts to a Semi-automated Argumentation System

Adam Wyner

King's College London, United Kingdom


A Case Study on the Frame of Legal Language

Pi-chan Hu

National Chengchi University, Taiwan


Narrative Domains in Serial Offender Narrative Discourse: Implications for Geographic Profiling

Blake Stephen Howald

Georgetown University, United States of America

10:30am - 12:30pm2D: Authorship / Speakership analysis
Session Chair: Dr. Jordi Cicres
5A-06 
 

Towards a morpho-syntactic base-rate knowledge: apparent and real time dimensions of idiolectometric analyses of Catalan

Maria Teresa TURELL

UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA, Spain


Morpho-syntactic idiolectal similitude in written Spanish

Maria S. Spassova

Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain


Stylometric and error analysis in the context of a style shift in abusive e-mail texts

Hilton Hubbard

University of South Africa, South Africa


Indicators of authorship by a L1 German speaker for English texts.

Ria Charlotte Perkins and Tim Grant

Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom www.forensiclinguistics.net

12:30pm - 2:00pmLunch
 
2:00pm - 3:30pm3A: Courtroom discourse: Interpreting
Session Chair: Prof. Susan Berk-Seligson
2A-06 
 

Quality of witness testimony taken with the assistance of unqualified interpreters and its impact on a criminal trial– an Irish example.

Karolina Jarmolowska

Dublin City University, Ireland (Republic of)


Testifying with a court interpreter or without: Comparing recurrent narratives across proceedings

Philipp Sebastian Angermeyer

York University, Canada


The Dynamics of Interaction in Magistrates' Courts in St. Lucia.

Sandra Evans

University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago

2:00pm - 3:30pm3B: Problems in police interviews
Session Chair: Dr. Frances Eileen Rock
2A-02 
 

Who’s Telling the Truth?:Revisiting an Interrogation of an Accused Child Abuser

Kristina Ingrid Beckman1 and Mark McBeth2

1Pima Community College, United States of America; 2John Jay College of Criminal Justics, New York City, NY, USA


Interpreting 'uninterpretable' silences in police interviews

Ikuko Nakane

University of Melbourne, Australia


Police Interview and Court Proceedings -- In Search of Truth

Ester. Sin-man Leung

Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong S.A.R. - China

2:00pm - 3:30pm3C: Courtroom discourse: Linguistic analysis
Session Chair: Dr. Chris Heffer
5A-02 
 

Appraisal Linguistic Resources in Chinese Vs Common-law Civil Judgments of Intellectual Property Infringment Cases

Chuanyou Yuan

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China, China, Peoples Republic of


"If it doesn't fit you must acquit": 'Reasonable Doubt' and its influence on Modality in the Courtroom.

Lorenzo Patino

University of Ottawa, Canada

2:00pm - 3:30pm3D: Corpus linguistics applied across borders
Session Chair: Prof. Wilbert Spooren
5A-06 
 

Advances in Threat Assessment and Analysis Techniques: the Communicated Threat Assessment Reference Corpus (CTARC)

Tammy Gales1,2 and James Fitzgerald2

1University of California, Davis, United States of America; 2Academy Group, Inc., United States of America


Strangers in the Court? Identifying legal Maori language

Mamari Stephens

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

3:30pm - 4:00pmCoffee break
 
4:00pm - 5:30pm4A: Courtroom discourse: Expert witness
Session Chair: Dr. Katrijn Maryns
2A-06 
 

Professionalisation and standards in forensic linguistic practice.

Tim Grant

Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom


Language and power in a dialect speaking court: the case of Cyprus

GIORGOS VASOU GEORGIOU

University of Cyprus, Cyprus


Resolving Unresolvable Ambiguity in an Expert Witness's Testimony: A Court

Ronald Richard Butters and Tyler Kendall

Duke University, United States of America

4:00pm - 5:30pm4B: Police interview: Formulations
Session Chair: Dr. M. Komter
2A-02 
 

“So did you actually see him…”: Discourse markers, formulations and narrative evaluation in police interviews with rape complainants.

Nicci MacLeod

Centre for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, United Kingdom


Courtroom Interaction

Daniela Negraes Pinheiro Andrade

Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - Unisinos, Brazil


Confrontational formulations in police interrogations

Keun Young Sliedrecht

VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands, The

4:00pm - 5:30pm4C: Legal language and comprehensibility
Session Chair: Prof. Peter Tiersma
5A-02 
 

The Biggest Debt, The Least Understood: Comprehension of U.S. Mortgages

Gail Stygall

University of Washington, United States of America


Great Expectations: A Radical New Approach to Assessing Readability in Legal Documents

George D. Gopen

Duke University, United States of America


Latinisms in legal language revisited: comprehensibility within and across borders?

Miguel Ángel Campos-Pardillos and Isabel Balteiro-Fernández

University of Alicante, Spain, Spain

4:00pm - 5:30pm4D: Discrimination in the law
Session Chair: Dr. Joyce Lamerichs
5A-06 
 

Linguistic Ideology versus Linguistic Practice: The Cognitive and Cultural Challenge of Code-Switching to English-Only Rules in American Workplaces

Janet Ainsworth

Seattle University, United States of America


Keeping it Real or a Whitewash: Dialogue & Review of Reasons for Peremptory Strikes

Mel Greenlee

California Appellate Project, United States of America


Definitions of anti-semitism within the EU: a case of legilinguistic lobbying

Susan Blackwell1 and Willem Meijs2

1University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; 2Language Consultancy Desk, Birmingham, UK

 
Date: Wednesday, 08/07/2009
9:00am - 10:00amPlenary 3: Edward Finegan: 'Of course, legal drafters should avoid intensifiers. Blah, blah, blah!'
 
 

Of course, legal drafters should avoid intensifiers. Blah, blah, blah!

Edward Finegan

University of Southern California, United States of America

10:00am - 10:30amCoffee break
 
10:30am - 12:30pm5A: Courtroom discourse: Dramatization
Session Chair: Dr. M. Komter
2A-06 
 

The cultural defense as courtroom drama: The interactional construction of sameness and difference in criminal trial discourse

Sigurd D'hondt

Ghent University, Belgium


Theatricks on trial: the intertextual construction of legal cases

Katrijn Maryns

Gent University, Belgium


Reported speech in monologues by prosecutor and defence lawyer in the courtroom

Petra Wilma Jolanda Sneijder

Vrije Universiteit, Netherlands, The


Rethinking Jury Instructions: Fact-Finding v. Legal Theory?

Bethany K. Dumas

The University of Tennessee, United States of America

10:30am - 12:30pm5B: Authorship, plagiarism, & software
Session Chair: Prof. Malcolm Coulthard
2A-02 
 

Plagiarism of the greatest ever theory or just simultaneous discovery of the theory of evolution?

David Woolls1 and David Hallmark2

1CFL Software Limited, United Kingdom; 2Hallmarks Solictors, United Kingdom


When News becomes a Forensic Issue

Rui Manuel Sousa Silva1, Belinda Maia2 and Tim Grant1

1Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom; 2Universidade do Porto & CLUP, Portugal


20,000 Ways Not to Do Authorship Attribution -- and a Few that Work

Patrick Juola

Duquesne University, United States of America


Is individual variation the neglected step-sibling in authorship analysis?

John Gabriel Olsson

Forensic Linguistics Institute, United Kingdom

10:30am - 12:30pm5C: Linguistic Analysis: Deception, oddness, illness detection
Session Chair: Keun Young Sliedrecht
5A-02 
 

"Oddness" in Suicide Notes

Jess Jann Shapero

The University of Birmingham, U.K., United Kingdom


A Strategy for Deception Detection: Collective Cues to Deception in Written Text

Isabel Carlota Picornell

Aston University, United Kingdom


Acquitted: Mentally Unstable

Matthew Robert Baldock and Tim Grant

Centre of Forensic Linguistics at Aston University, United Kingdom


Error production strategies for deception purposes

Eilika Fobbe

University of Goettingen, Germany

10:30am - 12:30pm5D: Interpreting records, evidentiality and court judgements
Session Chair: Dr. Ronald Richard Butters
5A-06 
 

Evidentiality and the construction of proff in crimes of word: calumny, slander and prejudice

Valda de Oliveira Fagundes01 and Mónica G. Zoppi Fontana02

1Unicamp, Brazil; 2Unicamp, Brazil


Post-Penetration Rape and the Decontextualization of Witness Testimony

Susan Lynn Ehrlich

York University, Toronto, Canada


Crtiteria for Judging the faithfulness of Records of Trials--- from the Point of View of Records of Civil Trials

Suzhen Liu and Feng Ge

Northwest University of Politics & Law, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China


Construction and Deconstruction in Court Judgments

Le Cheng

City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. - China

12:30pm - 2:00pmLunch
 
2:00pm - 3:30pm6A: Courtroom discourse: Lawyer & prosecutor language
Session Chair: Dr. Fleur van der Houwen
2A-06 
 

Between confrontational monologue and rational dialogue:

Liping Zhang

Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China, Peoples Republic of


A Means for Clarifying the Subtlety of Lawyers' Language

Sol Azuelos-Atias

University of Haifa, Israel


Three 19th-Century Trial Manuals: Exploring the Discursive Proto-Culture of Anglo-American Trial Advocacy

Philip Gaines

Montana State University, United States of America

2:00pm - 3:30pm6B: Police work
Session Chair: Tessa Cyrina van Charldorp
2A-02 
 

Scripting in non-emergency telephone calls to the police

Frances Eileen Rock

Cardiff University, United Kingdom


Accuracy and predictor variables of listeners’ identification of male speaker body size, age, and ethnicity

Jae Parker Heiner and Wendy Baker

Brigham Young University, United States of America


Police Discourse Around Domestic Violence

Nick Lynn1 and Susan Lea2

1University of Plymouth, United Kingdom; 2University of Plymouth, United Kingdom

2:00pm - 3:30pm6C: Legal text production and analysis
Session Chair: Prof. Lawrence Solan
5A-02 
 

Why are contracts in English so resistant to Plain language drafting?

Christopher Williams

University of Foggia, Italy


“Including but not limited to” everything in the universe? Interpreting the extent of lists in common law agreements

Víctor Manuel González Ruiz

Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain


On some features of supranational statutory texts in unifying Europe

Diana Dimitrova Yankova

New Bulgarian University, Bulgaria

2:00pm - 3:30pm6D: Speaker ID & idiolect
Session Chair: Prof. Maria Teresa TURELL
5A-06 
 

The effect of language contact on a speaker’s idiolect: variation in apparent and real time.

Núria Gavaldà

Unversitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain


Index of Idiolectal Similitude (IIS) for the phonological module of Mexican Spanish

Fernanda López Escobedo

Universitat Pompeu Fabra


Index of Idiolectal Similitude for the phonological module of Catalan: apparent and real time revisited

Jordi Cicres

UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA, Spain

3:30pm - 4:00pmCoffee break
 
4:00pm - 5:30pm7A: Courtroom discourse: Pragmatics
Session Chair: Prof. Sigurd D'hondt
2A-06 
 

The Pragmatics of Courtroom Discourse: Saving One’s Face in the Witness Box

Jan Chovanec

Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic


Does ‘adversarial’ mean ‘impolite’ in the courtroom? A diachronic exploration of face-threatening-acts

Dawn Elizabeth Archer

University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom


Mitigation as a Stance-marking Strategy in Courtroom

SHENG-HSIU CHIU1 and LILY I-WEN SU2

1National Taiwan University, TAIWAN; 2National Taiwan University, TAIWAN

4:00pm - 5:30pm7B: Language minority & administration of justice
Session Chair: Dr. Diana Eades
2A-02 
 

Inter-ethnic discourse over indigenous rights to autonomous administration of justice in highland Ecuador: constructing and interrupting Quichua narratives”

Susan Berk-Seligson

Vanderbilt University, United States of America


The Koori Court revisited: a Review of Cultural and Language Awareness in the Administration of Justice

Natalie Alison Stroud

Monash University, Australia


SUPPORTING JUSTICE REFORM IN JAMAICA THROUGH LANGUAGE POLICY CHANGE

Celia Nadine Blake

University of the West Indies, Jamaica

4:00pm - 5:30pm7C: Legal translation
Session Chair: Dr. Krzysztof Kredens
5A-02 
 

Legal translation problems versus legal language features

Aleksandra Matulewska

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland


Reconstructing Reality in Legal Source Texts

Rong Yi-yu

Chongqing Medical University, China, Peoples Republic of


Legal translator training: knowledge-based approach to terminology for inverse translation purposes

Lucja Biel

Institute of English, University of Gdansk, Poland

4:00pm - 5:30pm7D: Professionalisation and teaching of forensic linguistics
Session Chair: Prof. Edward Finegan
5A-06 
 

A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing- True or False? Teaching Non-academic Forensic Linguistics in the Workplace

Ann Maria Ellis

St Helens College, United Kingdom


Implementing the “Guidelines for the Use of Language Analysis” when determining national or regional origin in asylum cases

Anna M. de Graaf, Maaike Verrips and Carolien van den Hazelkamp

De Taalstudio, Netherlands, The


Setting Standards for Research In Forensic Linguistic Identification

Lawrence Solan

Brooklyn Law School, United States of America

7:00pm - 11:00pmConference dinner (social program)
 
 
Date: Thursday, 09/07/2009
10:00am - 10:30amCoffee
 
10:30am - 12:30pm8A: Courtroom & mediation discourse: Professional & lay
Session Chair: Dr. Fleur van der Houwen
2A-06 
 

A Corpus Analysis of Linguistic Communication between Lay and Professional Judges in Japan

Syugo Hotta1, Masahiro Fujita2 and Junsaku Nakamura3

1Meiji University; 2National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies; 3Ritsumeikan University


The Unequal Encounter between the Cross-Examiner and the Witness in a Judicial Cross-Examination: The case of Goldenberg Commission of Enquiry in Kenya.

Ogone John Obiero

Leipzig University, Germany


Homeless Court in Santa Monica, California

Gillian Grebler

Santa Monica Community College, United States of America


Assessments in family mediation interaction

Paulo Cortes Gago

Federal University at Juiz de Fora, Brazil

10:30am - 12:30pm8B: Speaker ID
Session Chair: Dr. Tim Grant
2A-02 
 

Spectral characteristics of sounds as predictors of speech volume level

Anja Geumann

Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany


The variations of F0, F1 and F2: examples in the Spanish language of Chile

CLAUDIA ROSAS1 and JORGE SOMMERHOFF2

1INSTITUTO DE LINGÜISTICA Y LITERATURA/ UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE (CHILE); 2INSTITUTO DE ACÚSTICA/ UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE (CHILE)


Analysis of Yoruba tones and double consonants for forensic speaker identification purposes

Augustine Agwuele

Texas State University, San Marcos, TX. USA, United States of America

10:30am - 12:30pm8C: Linguistic analysis: Discourse markers, labeling & membership categorization
Session Chair: Dr. Janet Cotterill
5A-02 
 

Forensic Narrative Revisited: Category, Structure, Inequality

Chris Heffer

Cardiff University, United Kingdom


Forensic applications of discourse marker analysis

Robert Andrew Leonard

Hofstra University Forensic Linguistics Project, United States of America


Membership Category Terms in Court Discourse about Same-Sex Marriage

Karen Tracy and Robert T. Craig

University of Colorado, United States of America

10:30am - 12:30pm8D: Courtroom discourse: speech acts
Session Chair: Dr. Petra Wilma Jolanda Sneijder
5A-06 
 

Rise and fall of a speech act sanction: Apologizing in German juvenile criminal justice

Gabriele Klocke

University of Regensburg, Germany


Performativity, Technology and Judicial Activity: Opening French Courtroom Hearings at a Distance by Videoconference

Christian LICOPPE1 and Laurence DUMOULIN2

1Telecom Paristech, France; 2ISP6GAPP, ENS Cachan, France


Humor in the adversarial courtroom

Noraini Ibrahim and Nor Hashimah Jalaluddin

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia


Presuppositions in Court Examinations

Ying-long Zheng

Zhejiang Gongshang University, China, Peoples Republic of

12:30pm - 2:00pmLunch & Business meeting (location for businesss meeting tba)
 
2:00pm - 3:30pm9A: Jury instructions
Session Chair: Prof. Bethany K. Dumas
2A-06 
 

The Effect of Narrativisation on the Comprehension of Jury Instructions

Sally Elizabeth Nelson

Cardiff University, United Kingdom


Clarity in Death Penalty Jury Instructions: Ensuring Justice by Explaining the Law to Non-Lawyers

Joseph Devney

Devney Linguistic Consulting, United States of America


Asking jurors to do the impossible

Peter Tiersma

Loyola Law School, United States of America

2:00pm - 3:30pm9B: Police interview
Session Chair: Dr. Kate Haworth
2A-02 
 

Identifying effective question strategies within police investigative interviews

Andy Griffiths1,2

1Sussex Police, United Kingdom; 2University of Portsmouth


"I know it sounds daft but": The effect of the tape on the interaction in police interviews

Elisabeth Kate Carter

University of Essex, United Kingdom

2:00pm - 3:30pm9C: Language policy and language proficiency
Session Chair: Prof. William Gregory Eggington
5A-02 
 

Language Policy, Language Choice and Language Alternation in Conflict Resolution: Comparing Adversarial and Arbitral Discourse in Multilingual Malaysia.

Richard Powell1 and Azirah Hashim2

1Nihon University, Japan; 2Malaya University, Malaysia


Exploring issues in “faking” or “malingering” language proficiency by suspects

Margaret van Naerssen

Immaculata University, United States of America


The impact of the Literacy/ Illiteracy parameter on Moroccan criminal trials.

Fatima-Zahra Lamrani

Mohamed V University,Rabat, Morocco

2:00pm - 3:30pm9D: Authorship analysis, Linguistic Style Matching, Translation
Session Chair: John Gabriel Olsson
5A-06 
 

I never said that! The problem of translated records of interpreted police interviews with suspects

Krzysztof Kredens

Aston University, United Kingdom


Propositional Density in Authorship Analysis: Automated vs. Manual Measurement

G. Burns Cooper

University of Alaska Fairbanks, United States of America


Linguistic Style Matching in Crisis Negotiations: A Comparative Analysis of Suicidal and Surrender Outcomes

Randall Rogan

Wake Forest University, United States of America

3:30pm - 4:00pmCoffee break
 
4:00pm - 5:00pmPlenary 4: Ton Broeders: ‘Recent Trends in Forensic Linguistics – Avoiding the Observer’s Paradox and Formulating Logical Conclusions’
 
 

‘Recent Trends in Forensic Linguistics – Avoiding the Observer’s Paradox and Formulating Logical Conclusions’

Ton Broeders

Maastricht University and Leiden University, Netherlands, The

5:00pmReception